Working Solutions - South Africa
Sharing Public and Private
Resources
In 1996, the public hospital and surrounding
clinics in Uitenhage, an industrial town in the Eastern Cape
province in South Africa, were short of doctors and their
infrastructure and services were beginning to deteriorate due to
constraints on government funding. Many of the hospital's
fee-paying, insured patients had shifted to nearby private
hospitals, and revenues had fallen considerably. At the same time, a
large factory in the town was concerned about the large and rapidly
increasing cost of providing health coverage for its employees and
was seeking a less expensive, more sustainable health care package.
In response to these factors, a private
group of local physicians approached the public hospital and
proposed creating a partnership in which they would renovate one of
the hospital's underused wards and provide services there for
members of a new health plan. Under the arrangement developed by the
physicians and the hospital, the physicians' group agreed to:
- renovate a 25-bed ward, including
painting, repairing the bathroom, and providing bed linen;
- refer and treat members who required
inpatient care, and private patients referred by other physicians,
under other health plans;
- pay the standard Department of Health
fee-per-service to the hospital, which passes it on to the
government treasury;
- in addition, pay 30 percent of fees into
a trust fund for improvements to the hospital and nearby public
clinics;
- provide services at nearby public primary
health care clinics associated with the hospital at no charge to
the Department of Health;
- provide on-call coverage after hours for
both private and public patients at the main community health
center in the town.
Under the arrangement, the hospital agreed
to provide nursing care, food, diagnostic and operating room
services, maintenance and cleaning, and administration at the same
level provided for public patients.
The group of physicians then approached the
factory and offered them a health plan under which employees and
dependents would receive comprehensive health care for a fixed
monthly fee that was significantly lower than that of the other
health plans offered by the employer. The employer offered to share
the monthly fee with its employees on a 50/50 basis. The majority of
employees joined the new plan.
Benefits
The public sector and the community both
have benefitted from this partnership in the following ways:
- the public sector has recovered some of
its costs and has been able to improve services for public
patients;
- improved access for public patients to
quality health care through local primary health care clinics;
- reduced pressure on hospital outpatient
services;
- the establishment of a public Rape Crisis
Center at the hospital.
The private sector has also benefitted by
making a profit, and factory employees and their families have
benefitted by having a more affordable health care plan.
Factors Contributing
to Success of the Partnership Several
factors have led to the success of the partnership, including the
ability of the physicians' group to invest in upgrading the ward,
the large supply of potential health plan members, and the
availability of skilled hospital administrative staff who could
handle registration, records management, and billing for the
physicians' group.
Built-in incentives
to keep health care costs low. Because the plan's members pay a
fixed monthly fee and do not pay for individual services, the
physicians' group bears the financial risk for the care of the
plan's members. This risk has provided an incentive for physicians
to control costs by using low-cost preventive and ambulatory care,
minimizing use of hospital inpatient services, limiting hospital
stays where possible, and using lower cost public hospitals. Keeping
costs low will help ensure that the monthly fee for the plan remains
affordable.
Large number of
potential members. The factory employees provided a ready supply
of potential members for the health plan. The fact that the
physicians were already well known in the community increased the
employees' willingness to join the plan. Having a large number of
members has provided the plan with an important financial base,
which has allowed the group to spread the risk, recoup its initial
investment, and keep administrative costs low.
Willingness of the
physicians' group to invest in the partnership. The physicians'
group was willing and able to invest in upgrading the hospital, a
necessary step in providing services under the plan. Furthermore,
the group had the management skills necessary to develop and
implement its side of the partnership, including developing
procedures for managing care, such as using an approved drug list,
and controlling costs.
Existing skills and
systems at the hospital. The expertise of the staff of the
hospital's efficient patient registration and billing systems have
contributed to recovering revenues in a timely and cost-efficient
manner.
Willingness of the
hospital union to participate. The hospital workers' trade union
participated in joint discussions with the community and factory
trade union representatives about the plan. The union's initial
opposition was overcome when it became clear that the partnership's
intention was to strengthen public services, not to privatize them,
and that the community supported the initiative.
Leadership. The
leaders of both the physicians' group and the local government
health department trusted each other, were committed to the
partnership concept, and were willing to take risks and be flexible.
Modeling the
Partnership The Uitenhage partnership is
now serving as a model for the development of other partnerships in
South Africa. Each new partnership is different, varying according
to local circumstances, but they all seek to bring together
complementary resources and to benefit public patients.
This working solution is a brief description of
a partnership initiative of the South African Department of Health
supported by the Equity Project, which is funded by USAID/South
Africa and managed by Management Sciences for
Health. |